Monday, January 21, 2008
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Update - working a little smaller now
These are also at the new collage site.
As I was Saying to Diane...
As I was Saying to Diane...
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Desirable Residence 1
Desirable Residence 1
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h (paper size, image size varies)
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Rodent Beat
Rodent Beat
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h (paper size, image size varies)
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Desirable Residence 2
Desirable Residence 2
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h (paper size, image size varies)
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Parts
Parts
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h (paper size, image size varies)
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Desirable Residence 3
Desirable Residence 3
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h (paper size, image size varies)
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Hydrangea of Youth
Hydrangea of Youth
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
5.5"w x 8.5"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
As I was Saying to Diane...
As I was Saying to Diane...
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Desirable Residence 1
Desirable Residence 1
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h (paper size, image size varies)
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Rodent Beat
Rodent Beat
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h (paper size, image size varies)
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Desirable Residence 2
Desirable Residence 2
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h (paper size, image size varies)
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Parts
Parts
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h (paper size, image size varies)
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Desirable Residence 3
Desirable Residence 3
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
8.5"w x 5.5"h (paper size, image size varies)
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Hydrangea of Youth
Hydrangea of Youth
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
5.5"w x 8.5"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Inter/Exterior
Inter/Exterior
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
7"hx10.5"w
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Monday, November 19, 2007
Aprés le Deluge et Ski
Aprés le Deluge et Ski
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
10.5"w x 7"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
...yeah, welcome
…yeah, welcome
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
10.5"w x 7"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
No Hope from either Architecture or Science
No Hope from either Architecture or Science
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
10.5"w x 7"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Monday, November 12, 2007
Even More Happy Families
Even More Happy Families
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
7"w x 10"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Why was I saving that stamp?
Why was I saving this stamp?
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
7"w x 10"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Cartopia...for those who want it
Cartopia...for those who want it
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
10"w x 7"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Our Lady of the Insurance Claim
Our Lady of the Insurance Claim
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
10"w x 7"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Our Lady of the Cornfield
Our Lady of the Cornfield
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
10"w x 7"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Please! Visit our City!
Please! Visit our City!
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
10"w x 7"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Frida, Audrey, a kitten, some guy
Frida, Audrey, a kitten, some guy
Subtitle: "This is not my Frida Kahlo statement. I don't have a Frida Kahlo statement."
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
7"w x 10"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Friday, October 12, 2007
Moon Over Chinatown
Moon Over Chinatown
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
10"w x 7"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Monday, September 24, 2007
My Sweet Monster
My Sweet Monster
by K. Mas-Gallegos
Collage on paper
7"w x 10"h
Contact K. Mas-Gallegos about this collage
Thursday, September 13, 2007
The Comfy Chair
The Comfy Chair
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
10"w x 7"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
The Happy Family
The Happy Family
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
10"w x 7"h
This collage is in the Arroyo Arts Collective Cash-n-Carry show at The Acorn Gallery, December 1-16, 2007
Thursday, September 06, 2007
Monday, September 03, 2007
Moon Over Stowe
Moon Over Stowe
by Ginger Mayerson
Collage on paper
10"w x 7"h
Contact Ginger Mayerson about this collage
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
Happy Couple II
Happy Couple II
by K. Mas-Gallegos
Collage on paper
10"w x 7"h
Contact K. Mas-Gallegos about this collage
Friday, August 03, 2007
LA Collage Show! and Book!
First there was the LA Collage blog, now there is the LA Collage show!
LA COLLAGE
Opening reception August 11, 2007, 7-10 PM
Exhibition runs from August 6-continuing, 2007
Acorn Annex
135 N Avenue 50 (between Figueroa and Monte Vista, at the Metro tracks)
Los Angeles, CA 90042
Gallery hours: Saturday and Sunday, 12-4 PM
For other hours, directions and information, please call: 323-258-1435
And an LA Collage book, too.
Introduction by Suzanne Siegel to the LA Collage 2006/2007 book:
L A Collage
What to make of collage? So simple a child can do it, and millions of school children do. Yet the most famous artists of the last one hundred years have used collage as a medium of sophisticated expression. Virtually all the art movements of the twentieth century include collage, and today appropriation of images forms the standard of artistic practice.
A brief, personal perspective of 20th century collage
The first "fine art" use of collage dates to Picasso's 1912 cubist work, "Still Life with Chair Caning" which integrated a chair cane patterned oilcloth into an unusual oval format. Fragments of newspapers and wine labels quickly became part of the fractured surfaces of Picasso and Braque's cubist still lifes adding another dimension to their multiple viewpoints. Other early movements also found collage a dynamic tool. Russian constructivist artists, such as El Lissitsky, pioneered the art of photomontage for use in their exhibition posters and catalogs. The futurists, a radical Italian group of artists entranced with speed, technology and revolution, created Free Word collages meant to create visual associations with swirling abstractions of cut up and painted words. But it was the surrealists and the Dadaists who trans formed collage into a medium of psychological, social and political commentary. The surrealists also titled their collages creating a conundrum between image and text. Several of my favorites of this period are Kurt Schwitters, John Heartfield and Hannah Hoch, all German artists active in the 20s and 30s. The most abstract artist of the three, Schwitters collected found rubbish from the street, combining discarded scraps to poetic and transcendent effect. John Heartfield's incisive, powerful collages savaged Hitler's Germany during the 1930s. Born Helmut Herzfeld, he deliberately anglicized his name to protest the Nazi regime's policies. In one famous collage, "Hurrah, the butter is finished," a complacent German family is seated around a table under a portrait of Hitler. They and the baby in the carriage are devouring bicycle handlebars and metal parts, a response to Goebbel's propaganda of rationing to build the Nazi war machine. Heartfield's photomontages exposed the brutal, corrupt, dangerous nature of the fascists. Also involved with social critique, Hannah Hoch, one of the very few women Dadaists, made elegant. iconic and sensual female portraits that still resonate today.
In the 50s, Robert Motherwell simultaneously created mural scale abstract expressionist pieces along side small collages. He utilized torn posters, labels, his daily mail, cigarette packets, and other detritus of life to create a visual diary of every day living. The term Pop Art came from British artist, Richard Hamilton's small 1956 collage, "Just What Is It That Makes Today's Homes, So Different, So Appealing?" a pastiche of advertisements from magazines that included a male body builder holding a tennis racket labeled POP. Among the many pop artists incorporating found imagery into their work, Rauschenberg especially has used appropriated topical imagery in mysterious combinations of breathtaking beauty. While Rauschenberg juxtaposes street signs and astronauts, famous people and art historical references into a dizzying visual cacophony of multiple associations, Joseph Cornell's delicate collages and boxes reflect a romantic narrative, vastly different, but just as mysterious.
Today collage is ubiquitous. Any group gallery show will include collages on exhibit. Surrounded as we are by mediated images, it has become the dominant artistic practice. Of Los Angeles contemporary collage artists, two that I especially admire follow the threads of previous movements. David Hockney's gigantic and impressive photo collages are a reworking of the cubist oeuvre. They sparkle with wit as he dissects luncheon guests or gives us the grandeur of an almost anonymous high desert landscape. In another scale, Betye Saar's intimate collages express narrative and social concerns. She tells personal stories of family memories and reference instances of discrimination and racism in beautifully subtle pieces.
L A Collage Process
K. Mas Gallegos and Ginger Mayerson, two LA collagistas, fit into this tradition of serious fine art collage. For both, their work involves appropriation of art historical and media imagery in dynamic experimentation and gives second life to the detritus of advertising illustration. Involved with issues of identity, relationships, social criticism, and personal expression, these two artists are engaged in recontextualizing their materials, layering and transforming them to create new narratives. Their pieces raise questions about representations of women, sexual difference, commodification and consumerism. Gallegos, an artist/gallery director and Mayerson, a musician/writer meet on Wednesday evenings to create their small collages; more than ninety percent of which are 7' by 10' (a few even smaller ones by Mayerson are represented in this collection). They share magazines and other materials. From the number of art historical references: Ingres to Gainsborough, Rubens to Max Beckman, Rousseau to Klimt, Hokusai to Carlos Almaraz, Gauguin to Gibson girls, the two are ripping through their college art history texts. They bounce ideas off each other, offer opinions when asked, and consult on titles. Their process involves the simple playfulness of cutting and pasting on paper. During their sessions their conversations include the collages they're creating and discussions about art in general, money, current events and other philosophical issues.
After the collages are finished on paper, they are scanned and posted onto their blogspot (www.lacollage.blogspot.com) the next day. The world wide web offers them a huge potential audience, and they reasonably price their collages to sell. This unusual method of disseminating and selling was inspired by a Kentucky collage artist named Randal Plowman who creates a collage a day and posts them on his blog. Links to his web site and other collage artists the pair think are cool can be accessed from their blog.
The interactive relationship of the two artists is reflected in the similar themes they address. Representations of women from art history, fashion magazines, and female figures constructed from fragments abound. The female persona as siren, angel, seductress, woman as object is explored. Relatively few maternal representations are included. These images are almost all empowered by their scale within the frame or their action in the picture plane. The subject of relationships and sexual difference is depicted in both artists' work. However, the Los Angeles of the L A Collage is addressed in distinctly different ways. The Los Angeles of Gallegos is clearly formed by her Chicano/Latina roots, both in the Mayan art and pop culture (la lucha masked wrestlers ala Basquiat, swaying palm trees, zoot suiters) she includes. But Gallegos seems not so much to be concerned about the particulars of Los Angeles as she is about elucidating personal, deeply felt issues. She refers to their endeavor as la collage. More distanced in her view, Mayerson, on the other hand, entitles one series of work "Lost Surfer" and another deals with an abandoned mini-mall. Certainly the surfer symbolizes L. A., even if he's lost in a Japanese print The Wave by Hokusai and rotating mini-malls are part of L.A.'s endless reinvention of itself in suburban development.
L A Collage Works
As visual works, the 60 plus collages speak for themselves. I would like to compare the two collagists and comment with a personal reading on a few that have resonance for me.
Waiter! (pg 11) by K. Mas-Gallegos presents a constructed female form in a pose of supplication with palms open. Mapped on the body are colorful, abstract and serpent designs as well as skeleton parts and an exposed heart: symbols of ancient Aztec culture. The head could be a Latina; her angry shout made more terrifying by the tongue, nose, and eyelid piercing. She rises out of a colorful Carlos Almaraz fragmented landscape and stones press on her head. Victim or goddess? Her grito indicates she will be served. In contrast Ginger Mayerson's Corona (pg 37) positions a regal Renaissance female figure between a monumental mountainscape and an overstuffed armchair. The rich earth tones of the figure's clothing, the chair and the mountains are juxtaposed with the cool blue of the sky and the woman's placid expression. The triangular composition of the collage draws your eye to the woman's waiting face and the mountain peak that replicates her crown. Is she trapped between civilization and nature? Is the armchair a throne and the woman the power behind it? The meaning of both collages is illusive and intriguing.
Addressing a similar theme, Gallegos' Desert Dreams (pg 20) and Mayerson's Traveling Light 2 (pg 53) deal with a fantasy L. A., our journey through it and immigration. Again Gallegos' appropriates from Almaraz, a seminal Chicano artist, emblematic of the L. A. Chicano art scene. Cut outs of his paintings of twisted skyscrapers and a smoking bungalow edge a curved yellow highway, whose line symbolizes the border. A motorcycle and packed station wagon are ready to provide a quick escape for the two women peering at the road and the bridge across, but perhaps they'll climb the ladder instead. This white ladder, reaching up and out of the picture, resembles an oil derrick or a beacon. It serves to visually balance the dark cityscape and signals aspirations and obstacles. Mayerson reads the city differently. In Traveling Light 2, a time exposure night photograph of downtown Los Angeles turns the cars on the freeway into streaks of light in contrast to the office buildings whose lit windows form a black and white checkerboard. In the foreground a steer crosses the light streaked freeway. Standing on its back, a small Asian boy dressed in a ceremonial Japanese kimono so barely touches the steer as to almost float above it. The steer is plodding and tired while the boy is youthful, but serious. Thus, the powerful city of Los Angeles is pictured by Mayerson as the intersection of East and West.
In both The Band (pg 65) by Mayerson and Sterile Condo With Drawn Curtains (pg 14) by Gallegos two groups of men confront the viewer. Both black and white photos center the collage, but Gallegos' men are Latinos and Mayerson's are Anglo. Each collage also contains a central female figure. In Gallegos' collage, the draped nude (drawn curtains?) sprawls voluptuously at the feet of the male group. Her face, and therefore her identity are hidden. The surrounding lush fruit and flowers contribute to the sensuality of the prostrate figure. Yet the whole collage creates a disturbing dissonance between the vulnerable, adoring woman in living color (nature) and the tough guys in graphic black and white who ignore her to gaze confidently at the viewer. The shadowy grey Ferris wheel background and the negative head shapes echo the group photo's mechanical quality. The composition is like a religious last supper with the white dove Holy Ghost hovering above. To me, this collage is an indictment of the unequal relationships in patriarchal culture. The opposite is occurring in Mayerson's fantasy collage The Band. Although the four male figures stare at the viewer, they share equal picture space with a fanciful cat woman. Taking off her mask, she sticks out her long red tongue, her voluminous black strapless dress floating on the water with four little illuminated houses. The men here are stuck on shore. In their black and white photo faded to grey, they exist in a misty, rural landscape. They subserviently wait for the cat queen to signal that they should strike up the band and play to her tune.
Gallegos and Mayerson switch approaches to the representation of women with fluidity as my one last comparison of their incisive observations will show. In Mayerson's Girlfriends, (pg 67) three women (two portraits from art history) pose in front of a huge hydroelectric dam with traffic streaming below. The three girlfriends do not smile or even interact with each other. Only one gazes out at the viewer. The other two are demurely looking out of the picture plane past their friend. In front of the three floats a fish bowl with gold fish swimming. The women, like the fish, are contained; their power restrained like the dam in the background. This is not a happy picture. On the other hand, Barbarian in a Bowtie (pg 24) by Gallegos is a hoot. At first glance I did not see the Viking hat with the horns and mistook the man for a portrait of Henry VIII. How appropriate I thought! He's lost his head and Marie Antoinette has kept hers. Whatever. The woman dominates his tiny figure with her out of scale head and hand. Seated in a posh interior, they strike a casual movie star pose. Their glittering consumerism is reflected in her starry eyes. They make the perfect L. A. couple.
In these and in many other pieces in this collection, the two collagistas deftly wield their scissors as artist tools of color, form, composition and space. They reconfigure disparate elements into surprising new associations. There is not enough space in this short introduction to discuss in depth the many intriguing pieces by Gallegos and Mayerson. Viewers are invited to look through this book and discover for themselves the visual pleasures that these thought provoking collages offer.
Suzanne Siegel
July, 2007
Images:
Picasso Still Life with Chair Caning
Kurt Schwitters Opened by Customs
John Heartfield Hurrah, the butter is finished
Hannah Hoch Pretty Girl
Richard Hamilton Just What Is It That Makes Today's Homes, So Different, So Appealing?
Robert Rauchenberg Signs
Joseph Cornell Robert Schumann/German Romanticism
Bettye Saar L.A. Sky with Spinning Hearts
LA COLLAGE
Opening reception August 11, 2007, 7-10 PM
Exhibition runs from August 6-continuing, 2007
Acorn Annex
135 N Avenue 50 (between Figueroa and Monte Vista, at the Metro tracks)
Los Angeles, CA 90042
Gallery hours: Saturday and Sunday, 12-4 PM
For other hours, directions and information, please call: 323-258-1435
And an LA Collage book, too.
Introduction by Suzanne Siegel to the LA Collage 2006/2007 book:
L A Collage
What to make of collage? So simple a child can do it, and millions of school children do. Yet the most famous artists of the last one hundred years have used collage as a medium of sophisticated expression. Virtually all the art movements of the twentieth century include collage, and today appropriation of images forms the standard of artistic practice.
A brief, personal perspective of 20th century collage
The first "fine art" use of collage dates to Picasso's 1912 cubist work, "Still Life with Chair Caning" which integrated a chair cane patterned oilcloth into an unusual oval format. Fragments of newspapers and wine labels quickly became part of the fractured surfaces of Picasso and Braque's cubist still lifes adding another dimension to their multiple viewpoints. Other early movements also found collage a dynamic tool. Russian constructivist artists, such as El Lissitsky, pioneered the art of photomontage for use in their exhibition posters and catalogs. The futurists, a radical Italian group of artists entranced with speed, technology and revolution, created Free Word collages meant to create visual associations with swirling abstractions of cut up and painted words. But it was the surrealists and the Dadaists who trans formed collage into a medium of psychological, social and political commentary. The surrealists also titled their collages creating a conundrum between image and text. Several of my favorites of this period are Kurt Schwitters, John Heartfield and Hannah Hoch, all German artists active in the 20s and 30s. The most abstract artist of the three, Schwitters collected found rubbish from the street, combining discarded scraps to poetic and transcendent effect. John Heartfield's incisive, powerful collages savaged Hitler's Germany during the 1930s. Born Helmut Herzfeld, he deliberately anglicized his name to protest the Nazi regime's policies. In one famous collage, "Hurrah, the butter is finished," a complacent German family is seated around a table under a portrait of Hitler. They and the baby in the carriage are devouring bicycle handlebars and metal parts, a response to Goebbel's propaganda of rationing to build the Nazi war machine. Heartfield's photomontages exposed the brutal, corrupt, dangerous nature of the fascists. Also involved with social critique, Hannah Hoch, one of the very few women Dadaists, made elegant. iconic and sensual female portraits that still resonate today.
In the 50s, Robert Motherwell simultaneously created mural scale abstract expressionist pieces along side small collages. He utilized torn posters, labels, his daily mail, cigarette packets, and other detritus of life to create a visual diary of every day living. The term Pop Art came from British artist, Richard Hamilton's small 1956 collage, "Just What Is It That Makes Today's Homes, So Different, So Appealing?" a pastiche of advertisements from magazines that included a male body builder holding a tennis racket labeled POP. Among the many pop artists incorporating found imagery into their work, Rauschenberg especially has used appropriated topical imagery in mysterious combinations of breathtaking beauty. While Rauschenberg juxtaposes street signs and astronauts, famous people and art historical references into a dizzying visual cacophony of multiple associations, Joseph Cornell's delicate collages and boxes reflect a romantic narrative, vastly different, but just as mysterious.
Today collage is ubiquitous. Any group gallery show will include collages on exhibit. Surrounded as we are by mediated images, it has become the dominant artistic practice. Of Los Angeles contemporary collage artists, two that I especially admire follow the threads of previous movements. David Hockney's gigantic and impressive photo collages are a reworking of the cubist oeuvre. They sparkle with wit as he dissects luncheon guests or gives us the grandeur of an almost anonymous high desert landscape. In another scale, Betye Saar's intimate collages express narrative and social concerns. She tells personal stories of family memories and reference instances of discrimination and racism in beautifully subtle pieces.
L A Collage Process
K. Mas Gallegos and Ginger Mayerson, two LA collagistas, fit into this tradition of serious fine art collage. For both, their work involves appropriation of art historical and media imagery in dynamic experimentation and gives second life to the detritus of advertising illustration. Involved with issues of identity, relationships, social criticism, and personal expression, these two artists are engaged in recontextualizing their materials, layering and transforming them to create new narratives. Their pieces raise questions about representations of women, sexual difference, commodification and consumerism. Gallegos, an artist/gallery director and Mayerson, a musician/writer meet on Wednesday evenings to create their small collages; more than ninety percent of which are 7' by 10' (a few even smaller ones by Mayerson are represented in this collection). They share magazines and other materials. From the number of art historical references: Ingres to Gainsborough, Rubens to Max Beckman, Rousseau to Klimt, Hokusai to Carlos Almaraz, Gauguin to Gibson girls, the two are ripping through their college art history texts. They bounce ideas off each other, offer opinions when asked, and consult on titles. Their process involves the simple playfulness of cutting and pasting on paper. During their sessions their conversations include the collages they're creating and discussions about art in general, money, current events and other philosophical issues.
After the collages are finished on paper, they are scanned and posted onto their blogspot (www.lacollage.blogspot.com) the next day. The world wide web offers them a huge potential audience, and they reasonably price their collages to sell. This unusual method of disseminating and selling was inspired by a Kentucky collage artist named Randal Plowman who creates a collage a day and posts them on his blog. Links to his web site and other collage artists the pair think are cool can be accessed from their blog.
The interactive relationship of the two artists is reflected in the similar themes they address. Representations of women from art history, fashion magazines, and female figures constructed from fragments abound. The female persona as siren, angel, seductress, woman as object is explored. Relatively few maternal representations are included. These images are almost all empowered by their scale within the frame or their action in the picture plane. The subject of relationships and sexual difference is depicted in both artists' work. However, the Los Angeles of the L A Collage is addressed in distinctly different ways. The Los Angeles of Gallegos is clearly formed by her Chicano/Latina roots, both in the Mayan art and pop culture (la lucha masked wrestlers ala Basquiat, swaying palm trees, zoot suiters) she includes. But Gallegos seems not so much to be concerned about the particulars of Los Angeles as she is about elucidating personal, deeply felt issues. She refers to their endeavor as la collage. More distanced in her view, Mayerson, on the other hand, entitles one series of work "Lost Surfer" and another deals with an abandoned mini-mall. Certainly the surfer symbolizes L. A., even if he's lost in a Japanese print The Wave by Hokusai and rotating mini-malls are part of L.A.'s endless reinvention of itself in suburban development.
L A Collage Works
As visual works, the 60 plus collages speak for themselves. I would like to compare the two collagists and comment with a personal reading on a few that have resonance for me.
Waiter! (pg 11) by K. Mas-Gallegos presents a constructed female form in a pose of supplication with palms open. Mapped on the body are colorful, abstract and serpent designs as well as skeleton parts and an exposed heart: symbols of ancient Aztec culture. The head could be a Latina; her angry shout made more terrifying by the tongue, nose, and eyelid piercing. She rises out of a colorful Carlos Almaraz fragmented landscape and stones press on her head. Victim or goddess? Her grito indicates she will be served. In contrast Ginger Mayerson's Corona (pg 37) positions a regal Renaissance female figure between a monumental mountainscape and an overstuffed armchair. The rich earth tones of the figure's clothing, the chair and the mountains are juxtaposed with the cool blue of the sky and the woman's placid expression. The triangular composition of the collage draws your eye to the woman's waiting face and the mountain peak that replicates her crown. Is she trapped between civilization and nature? Is the armchair a throne and the woman the power behind it? The meaning of both collages is illusive and intriguing.
Addressing a similar theme, Gallegos' Desert Dreams (pg 20) and Mayerson's Traveling Light 2 (pg 53) deal with a fantasy L. A., our journey through it and immigration. Again Gallegos' appropriates from Almaraz, a seminal Chicano artist, emblematic of the L. A. Chicano art scene. Cut outs of his paintings of twisted skyscrapers and a smoking bungalow edge a curved yellow highway, whose line symbolizes the border. A motorcycle and packed station wagon are ready to provide a quick escape for the two women peering at the road and the bridge across, but perhaps they'll climb the ladder instead. This white ladder, reaching up and out of the picture, resembles an oil derrick or a beacon. It serves to visually balance the dark cityscape and signals aspirations and obstacles. Mayerson reads the city differently. In Traveling Light 2, a time exposure night photograph of downtown Los Angeles turns the cars on the freeway into streaks of light in contrast to the office buildings whose lit windows form a black and white checkerboard. In the foreground a steer crosses the light streaked freeway. Standing on its back, a small Asian boy dressed in a ceremonial Japanese kimono so barely touches the steer as to almost float above it. The steer is plodding and tired while the boy is youthful, but serious. Thus, the powerful city of Los Angeles is pictured by Mayerson as the intersection of East and West.
In both The Band (pg 65) by Mayerson and Sterile Condo With Drawn Curtains (pg 14) by Gallegos two groups of men confront the viewer. Both black and white photos center the collage, but Gallegos' men are Latinos and Mayerson's are Anglo. Each collage also contains a central female figure. In Gallegos' collage, the draped nude (drawn curtains?) sprawls voluptuously at the feet of the male group. Her face, and therefore her identity are hidden. The surrounding lush fruit and flowers contribute to the sensuality of the prostrate figure. Yet the whole collage creates a disturbing dissonance between the vulnerable, adoring woman in living color (nature) and the tough guys in graphic black and white who ignore her to gaze confidently at the viewer. The shadowy grey Ferris wheel background and the negative head shapes echo the group photo's mechanical quality. The composition is like a religious last supper with the white dove Holy Ghost hovering above. To me, this collage is an indictment of the unequal relationships in patriarchal culture. The opposite is occurring in Mayerson's fantasy collage The Band. Although the four male figures stare at the viewer, they share equal picture space with a fanciful cat woman. Taking off her mask, she sticks out her long red tongue, her voluminous black strapless dress floating on the water with four little illuminated houses. The men here are stuck on shore. In their black and white photo faded to grey, they exist in a misty, rural landscape. They subserviently wait for the cat queen to signal that they should strike up the band and play to her tune.
Gallegos and Mayerson switch approaches to the representation of women with fluidity as my one last comparison of their incisive observations will show. In Mayerson's Girlfriends, (pg 67) three women (two portraits from art history) pose in front of a huge hydroelectric dam with traffic streaming below. The three girlfriends do not smile or even interact with each other. Only one gazes out at the viewer. The other two are demurely looking out of the picture plane past their friend. In front of the three floats a fish bowl with gold fish swimming. The women, like the fish, are contained; their power restrained like the dam in the background. This is not a happy picture. On the other hand, Barbarian in a Bowtie (pg 24) by Gallegos is a hoot. At first glance I did not see the Viking hat with the horns and mistook the man for a portrait of Henry VIII. How appropriate I thought! He's lost his head and Marie Antoinette has kept hers. Whatever. The woman dominates his tiny figure with her out of scale head and hand. Seated in a posh interior, they strike a casual movie star pose. Their glittering consumerism is reflected in her starry eyes. They make the perfect L. A. couple.
In these and in many other pieces in this collection, the two collagistas deftly wield their scissors as artist tools of color, form, composition and space. They reconfigure disparate elements into surprising new associations. There is not enough space in this short introduction to discuss in depth the many intriguing pieces by Gallegos and Mayerson. Viewers are invited to look through this book and discover for themselves the visual pleasures that these thought provoking collages offer.
Suzanne Siegel
July, 2007
Images:
Picasso Still Life with Chair Caning
Kurt Schwitters Opened by Customs
John Heartfield Hurrah, the butter is finished
Hannah Hoch Pretty Girl
Richard Hamilton Just What Is It That Makes Today's Homes, So Different, So Appealing?
Robert Rauchenberg Signs
Joseph Cornell Robert Schumann/German Romanticism
Bettye Saar L.A. Sky with Spinning Hearts